HR & legal ops
AI on employee files without exposing a single personal data point.
Pseudonymisation of identities, compensation, health data and contact details before AI ; local restoration ; nothing retained.
14 days on the Solo plan (1 seat), no credit card.
Cancel anytime - and since nothing is stored, you leave no data behind.
Banning doesn't work. IT blocked public AI tools : your HR teams use them to draft reviews, procedures and disciplinary letters.
The 3-step flow
Contracts, annual reviews, disciplinary files : names, salaries, health data and contact details neutralised.
Draft, summarise or translate in ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot : the AI only receives tokens.
Reinject data into the final document locally. Operation logs for DPO audit.
Three freedoms
Tool freedom
Any AI: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot. No lock-in, no quota. Your subscription stays yours : always the best model of the moment.
Usage freedom
No workflow change, no training. Protection adds on; your teams change nothing. That's why people adopt it instead of bypassing it.
Vendor freedom
Zero storage. Nothing stays with us: nothing to audit elsewhere, nothing to recover if you leave, no dependency.
GDPR compliance and HR sensitivity
Maximum GDPR sensitivity segment : art. 4(5) pseudonymisation as art. 32 security measure, auditable processing, zero document storage.
HR data must never go in plain text to a third-party model : Safe-Doc neutralises data before sending ; what leaves contains no identifiable personal information.
Objection: "HR data is too sensitive for external AI."
Exactly why it must never go in plain text. Safe-Doc neutralises data before AI ; what leaves contains no identifiable personal information.